Excel spreadsheets Alternative

Key differences

Spreadsheets and Smaply serve different needs at different stages of journey work. Here is a quick summary of key differences:

Visual storytelling: Smaply produces visual journey maps with drag-and-drop lanes, cards, and emotion curves designed for stakeholder communication. Spreadsheets produce formatted grids that convey data but do not tell a customer story.

Journey management at scale: Smaply provides journey linking, hierarchy views, governance roles, and portfolio-level visibility across all journeys. Spreadsheets store each journey as a separate file with no cross-journey connection.

Research traceability: Smaply's Research Hub preserves the full chain from source to quote to insight to portfolio item to journey map. Spreadsheet research lives in separate files connected only by manual cross-referencing.

Getting started: Spreadsheets are already deployed in most organizations at zero incremental cost. Smaply offers a free plan with purpose-built CJM capabilities from day one.

Read on to learn which best suits your needs.

Quick comparison

Visual storytelling: from grids to journey maps

Journey maps are communication tools. They need to tell a customer story, evoke empathy, and drive action. This is where the difference between spreadsheets and Smaply is most immediately visible.

Smaply produces visual journey maps with drag-and-drop cards, emotion curves, and structured lanes that are designed for stakeholder presentations, cross-functional alignment, and workshop facilitation. The output looks like a journey map because it is one. Teams can add images, embed Figma designs, display live metrics from Google Analytics, and show Jira ticket status alongside the touchpoints they relate to, all in one visual view.

A spreadsheet journey map looks like a spreadsheet. Columns represent stages, rows represent lanes, and cells contain text. Conditional formatting can approximate color coding, and inserted images float above the grid, but the format naturally encourages analytical, process-oriented thinking rather than customer-centered storytelling. Presenting a formatted grid to executives lacks the visual impact that drives action.

Visual storytelling is the most common reason teams outgrow spreadsheets for journey work. When the goal shifts from internal documentation to stakeholder communication, the format matters.

Journey management: from scattered files to a connected system

One or two journeys work fine in spreadsheets. The inflection point comes when a team manages five or more. Each journey is a separate file. Naming becomes inconsistent. Version confusion grows. There is no way to see where the same touchpoint appears across journeys, no way to click from one journey to a related sub-journey, and no single view of the full journey portfolio.

Smaply provides journey linking, map-of-maps views, cross-workspace connections, and governance features that spreadsheets cannot approximate. A Journey Coordinator owns each journey. A Journey Performance Indicator tracks its health. Portfolio summaries show all pain points, opportunities, and solutions across maps with current statuses. Tags organize journeys by business unit, product, or lifecycle stage.

This is not a limitation teams can work around with better folder structure. Journey management, meaning governance, hierarchy, cross-journey visibility, and ownership, is a structural capability that general-purpose spreadsheets were never designed to provide.

Portfolio and prioritization: from disconnected tracking to linked insights

Many teams do useful prioritization work in spreadsheets. Scoring matrices with weighted formulas, conditional formatting to highlight priorities, and pivot tables for aggregate views are all natural spreadsheet use cases. The breaking point is disconnection.

In a spreadsheet workflow, pain points are tracked in a separate file from the journey map where they were identified. Changes in one do not update the other. A pain point that appears in three journeys exists in three places (or requires manual aggregation). There is no live connection between the tracking list and the maps.

Smaply's portfolio system treats pain points, opportunities, and solutions as structured entities that live across journeys. Edit one, and it updates globally. Score items by impact, reach, and cost, then visualize them in a portfolio matrix for workshop-friendly prioritization. Link pain points to opportunities to solutions and see the full relationship chain. Attach customer quotes from Research Hub so every portfolio item carries its evidence. The result is prioritization that stays connected to its source, not a spreadsheet that drifts further from the maps it was supposed to track.

Research traceability: from lost insights to evidence-based decisions

Customer research generates insights that should flow into journey maps, inform portfolio items, and justify prioritization decisions. In spreadsheets, this connection degrades over time. Research notes sit in one file, journey maps in another, and the link between them is a manual cross-reference that nobody maintains after the first month.

Smaply's Research Hub is a dedicated synthesis environment. Upload interview transcripts or survey verbatims, and AI extracts quotes and detects sentiment. Review and organize insights before they touch any journey map. Then convert insights to portfolio items or merge them with existing ones, preserving the full traceability chain: source to quote to insight to portfolio item to journey map. Return later to add new evidence as more research comes in.

This traceability is one of Smaply's strongest capabilities, even compared to other dedicated CJM tools. For teams whose journey work needs to be grounded in real customer evidence, the gap between a research spreadsheet and Research Hub is substantial.

What spreadsheets do well, and when that is enough

Spreadsheets deserve credit for what they genuinely do well. Zero incremental cost is a real advantage. For teams doing their first one to three journeys, learning the practice, or operating without a dedicated CX budget, spreadsheets are a rational choice. The tool is already there, everyone knows how to use it, and it costs nothing extra.

Real-time co-authoring in Google Sheets and Excel Online is excellent. Google Sheets collaboration in particular is seamless and well-refined. For basic co-editing of journey content, spreadsheet collaboration works well.

Spreadsheets are enough when journey maps are a one-time project output, the audience is your immediate team, and the number of journeys stays small. When the practice matures, when journey maps need to communicate to stakeholders, when multiple journeys need to connect, when research needs to stay linked to decisions, that is when a purpose-built tool earns its place.

Pricing

Spreadsheets are effectively free for journey work because most organizations already pay for Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace. No budget approval is needed.

Smaply offers a free plan with 10 journey maps, 10 personas, and real CJM functionality, so the step from spreadsheets does not require budget approval either. Paid plans start at $38/editor/month (annual) for the Repository tier and scale to the Governance tier at $96/editor/month (annual) with unlimited workspaces, unlimited viewers, and SSO. All paid plans include unlimited journeys.

Both paths can start at zero cost. The difference is what you get: a blank grid you build from scratch, or a purpose-built journey management platform ready from day one.

Pricing subject to change. Check vendor websites for current pricing.

How to choose

Smaply is the better fit if:

• Your journey work has matured beyond one or two maps and you need cross-journey visibility
• You present journey maps to stakeholders and need visual output that communicates a customer story
• You want pain points, opportunities, and prioritization connected to your journey maps, not tracked in separate files
• You need research insights to stay linked to the journey decisions they inform
• You want purpose-built CJM capabilities without building everything from scratch

Spreadsheets may be the better fit if:

• You are doing your first journey maps and learning the practice
• Your journey work is a one-time project, not an ongoing practice
• Your team is small and can maintain consistency across a few files manually
• There is no budget for any new tool (though Smaply's free plan addresses this)

Want to explore Smaply further?

If Smaply feels like a better fit for your approach to journey management, try it free or talk to our team about your needs.

‍